TinyCP - Any experiences?
Has anyone been using TinyCP? Any experiences you can share regarding this cp?
It looks pretty light-weigth and clean.
Tagged:
Has anyone been using TinyCP? Any experiences you can share regarding this cp?
It looks pretty light-weigth and clean.
Comments
I started using it after facing several stupid issues with Virtualmin. The UI is really fast and clean, and seems to just work so far. I'd like to have nginx support though
Thanks for the feedback
Ympker's VPN LTD Comparison, Uptime.is, Ympker's GitHub.
Thanks.. just installed it - I agree that the UI is fast and clean. This is definitely something I can keep using on a test vps till it is ready for prime time.
VPS reviews and benchmarks |
The name of the panel though... Pedobear, pedobear...
But it looks like a nice sleek panel. I wish there was something like a security audit that it has passed...
Amitz, a very stable genius (it's true!) and Grand Rectumfier of the official LESLOS® (LES League of Shitposters).
Certified braindead since 1974 and still perfectly happy.
Free panels rarely pay for audits like this since they only live from donations anyway.
Ympker's VPN LTD Comparison, Uptime.is, Ympker's GitHub.
Sure. It just helps with trust issues...
Amitz, a very stable genius (it's true!) and Grand Rectumfier of the official LESLOS® (LES League of Shitposters).
Certified braindead since 1974 and still perfectly happy.
To be honest, if it were open source one can technically get it audited themselves, but it being closed source doesn't help
Well since they are (not yet) making any money from it, they don't have to proof anything to anyone. Those who like it can participate on their forums and get to know the members of the team, their ideals etc. those who don't.. well, can just use another free solution. If it was a paid panel, it'd be another story. I mean, my YmpKit on GitHub is nowhere near as stable/advanced as a project like Tinycp. But I also developed it for me to ease my personal workflow, not anyone elses. I shared it to get potential feedback/bug reports and to let others benefit from it, too. I don't want to proof anything to anyone though. That being said, I don't think they'd be opposed to someone donating them a security audit, or a security firm that wants their product to succeed, doing it for free. Wasn't there some security audit guy on this forum?
Ympker's VPN LTD Comparison, Uptime.is, Ympker's GitHub.
Fair enough, afaik, they have a plan to make it paid sometime in the future (about $1/mo iirc..?) They probably will get something done then I believe.
Yeah, they suggest on the frontpage that they may be charging a "minimal fee" at some point. But until then, I believe that one shouldn't expect them to invest any money in an audit. Once they go commercial, that's another story.
Ympker's VPN LTD Comparison, Uptime.is, Ympker's GitHub.
Thanks for this. I'm going to give this a try on my development server as a possible replacement for Virtualmin. The interface seems to be very clean and easy-to-use.
It looks nice, I'll give it that, but their security claims on the index don't make much sense... kind of turned me away from it.
Universal Layer LLC, a privacy conscious hosting provider
Check us out @ ulayer.net / twitter.com/ulayer_net
Not HTTPS, but HTTP + some custom something? Sounds weird ...
Did try it out a bit on Debian 9. A bit buggy for Apache. Will retry on Debian 10.
You can encrypt stuff with javascript on the client and then pass it to the server.
So its even encrypted when send over HTTP, without HTTPS.
Free NAT KVM | Free NAT LXC
This sounds questionable. From their statement, can't really gather what they're doing at all, they're using buzzwords.
The JavaScript to do all of that could be modified in transit if sent over HTTP though. It sounds like a backwards concept.
Universal Layer LLC, a privacy conscious hosting provider
Check us out @ ulayer.net / twitter.com/ulayer_net
Sounds weird indeed?
Ympker's VPN LTD Comparison, Uptime.is, Ympker's GitHub.
But aren't all the browsers wanting everyone to use HTTPS now? Or at least be moving your websites to use HTTPS in the near future.
I think forcing SSL wouldn't be an issue. What the guys don't feel well about (including me) is that they use their "custom hardened HTTP" connection while they should be using HTTPS. Going with that people would assume there'd be more security flaws. Not that this has been proofed yet afaik but still..
Ympker's VPN LTD Comparison, Uptime.is, Ympker's GitHub.
Seem like they have that now (v2).
They must be using https by now, there is no reason not to, and browsers are getting very hostile to non-ssl/tls.
LES • About • Donate • Rules • Support
Are we officially discouraging all necroposting? 🤔
Don't you think that discouraging and maybe a bit of good natured mocking may be appropriate if you quote and answer someone from a three year old post ?
Officially it was covered by Anthony in the first couple of comments in the rules thread.
Rule #1 Don't be a dick
LES • About • Donate • Rules • Support
Thanks, couldn't remember
(In some forums it's almost the opposite, you get yelled at for opening new topics "when it's already covered", so it's nice to know and be reminded of the policies.)
Not sure what punishment I deserve for being too lazy to scroll back to Anthony's rules, though ...
Hey I completely understand, I am just trying my best to keep everything clean and orderly around here.
Same as you I don't make any rules I just try to follow them.
LES • About • Donate • Rules • Support
For the record: TinyCP has been & still is, completely stable and dependable, for the past few years, running a couple of my small informational websites. I have (small) donated to the cause on a number of occasions.
It wisnae me! A big boy done it and ran away.
NVMe2G for life! until death (the end is nigh)
Thanks for the feedback mate
Ympker's VPN LTD Comparison, Uptime.is, Ympker's GitHub.
I thought this project was dead. It looks like they are bringing it back. I will have to spin up a VM on one of my Nodes and try it out.
Vladimir S. - IT Consultant, Entrepreneur, Web Developer, and Disability Advocate.
[email protected] | www.ivlad.net
i wish demo is up!
ThemeForest Profile
My 2c:
There are two ways of looking at forums.
Those who view them primarily as the first way, insist on opening new threads.
Those who view them primarily as the second way, prefer adding to an existing thread/topic.
I'm not really sure which way is better - and whether something in between is good or not (like this case, adding a response to a thread that isn't too long with dozens of posts).
For example:
I have often searched bikeforums.net. Threads with hundred posts are not easy to "go through" when searching info.
On the other hand, having a search show dozens of threads on practically the same topic - and figuring out that the newest thread doesn't contain the best answer is just as tedious.
Of course, I have always refrained from opening a topic if my problem has already been solved.
Many people don't have that problem.
Detailed info about providers whose services I've used:
BikeGremlin web-hosting reviews