Would y'all be interested in this dedicated server, and for how much?

skorupionskorupion Services Provider

The server would be:

Dual E5-2660 (~8.5k GB5) [UPGRADABLE]
256 GB DDR3 1600 Mhz
8x 1.2 TB SAS (~500 Power on Hours)
RAID controller: HPE Smart Array P420I 512MB
1 Gbps @ 25 TB
/29 IPv4
/64 IPv6
Located either in Bulgaria or Estonia or somewhere else (recommend a colo provider if you know one)

Pice check
  1. What do you think would be a fair price that you'd pay for that server? [all prices monthly]18 votes
    1. 150 EUR - 160 EUR
      72.22%
    2. 160 EUR - 170 EUR
      22.22%
    3. 180 EUR - 190 EUR
        5.56%
    4. 200 EUR+ [comment an estimate]
        0.00%

Comments

  • HostSlickHostSlick Hosting Provider

    @skorupion said:
    Located either in Bulgaria or Estonia or somewhere else (recommend a colo provider if you know one)

    How Many you need to colocate?
    Half or Full rack needed?

    Thanks.

  • skorupionskorupion Services Provider

    @HostSlick said:

    @skorupion said:
    Located either in Bulgaria or Estonia or somewhere else (recommend a colo provider if you know one)

    How Many you need to colocate?
    Half or Full rack needed?

    Thanks.

    Whole 2 U

  • skorupionskorupion Services Provider

    Here is a little bit of YABS, after i got 8x 1.2 TB SAS disks:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2023-03-24                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Apr 19 04:31:57 PM UTC 2023
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 5 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz
    CPU cores  : 32 @ 1300.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 251.8 GiB
    Swap       : 8.0 GiB
    Disk       : 4.3 TiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-70-generic
    VM Type    : NONE
    Net Online : IPv4
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Netia SA
    ASN        : AS12741 Netia SA
    Host       : Netia SA
    Location   : Wroclaw, Lower Silesia (02)
    Country    : Poland
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 18.71 MB/s    (4.6k) | 99.18 MB/s    (1.5k)
    Write      | 18.72 MB/s    (4.6k) | 99.70 MB/s    (1.5k)
    Total      | 37.43 MB/s    (9.3k) | 198.89 MB/s   (3.1k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 287.60 MB/s    (561) | 361.13 MB/s    (352)
    Write      | 302.88 MB/s    (591) | 385.18 MB/s    (376)
    Total      | 590.49 MB/s   (1.1k) | 746.31 MB/s    (728)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 121 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec   | 51.1 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 122 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 33.5 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 122 Mbits/sec   | 929 Mbits/sec   | 25.8 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 116 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 110 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 116 Mbits/sec   | 296 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 114 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 157 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 35.0 Mbits/sec  | busy            | 186 ms
    
    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2764
    Multi Core      | 31564
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/16744761
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 612
    Multi Core      | 8711
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/21083022
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 542
    Multi Core      | 4084
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/974556
    
    YABS completed in 21 min 14 sec
    
  • HostSlickHostSlick Hosting Provider

    @skorupion said:
    Here is a little bit of YABS, after i got 8x 1.2 TB SAS disks:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2023-03-24                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Apr 19 04:31:57 PM UTC 2023
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 5 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz
    CPU cores  : 32 @ 1300.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 251.8 GiB
    Swap       : 8.0 GiB
    Disk       : 4.3 TiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-70-generic
    VM Type    : NONE
    Net Online : IPv4
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Netia SA
    ASN        : AS12741 Netia SA
    Host       : Netia SA
    Location   : Wroclaw, Lower Silesia (02)
    Country    : Poland
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 18.71 MB/s    (4.6k) | 99.18 MB/s    (1.5k)
    Write      | 18.72 MB/s    (4.6k) | 99.70 MB/s    (1.5k)
    Total      | 37.43 MB/s    (9.3k) | 198.89 MB/s   (3.1k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 287.60 MB/s    (561) | 361.13 MB/s    (352)
    Write      | 302.88 MB/s    (591) | 385.18 MB/s    (376)
    Total      | 590.49 MB/s   (1.1k) | 746.31 MB/s    (728)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 121 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec   | 51.1 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 122 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 33.5 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 122 Mbits/sec   | 929 Mbits/sec   | 25.8 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 116 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 110 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 116 Mbits/sec   | 296 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 114 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 157 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 35.0 Mbits/sec  | busy            | 186 ms
    
    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2764
    Multi Core      | 31564
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/16744761
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 612
    Multi Core      | 8711
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/21083022
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 542
    Multi Core      | 4084
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/974556
    
    YABS completed in 21 min 14 sec
    

    Yes its not a bad server but in my opinion the old HP ProLiant DL380 Gen8 is not worth it anymore.
    At least the SFF you have for 2,5" disks
    Now you waste alot of space (2U) when you can use at your Specs the 1U DL360p or DL360e Gen8 with 8x 2,5" as well

    Its only worth it if you use the DL380 Gen8 LFF with high storage disks. Then you will find alot of people buying it for their storage needs for much much higher prices. Even if its old server. If you have enough bandwidth as well.

    Now that you need only 2U space and not planning to colocate more then one, you have alot of costs compared to a Half or Full Rack with more servers while you maybe get 120-150€ for it if you dont want it to bite dust in the rack until someone pays 150€.+

    And in EU you have high power pricing now. Thats the problem besides its getting old.

    Its just my honest advice for you. Dont take it wrong. You asked how many this can get you. Heres the answer.

    I have the HP gen8 as well between the newer models. Any of them. Blade systems like the C7000 and S6500 included. I dont invest into it more anymore. Even E5v2.

    Thanked by (1)Talistech
  • Those network results are slow as treacle as well. It'll take an eternity to fill up those disks!

  • skorupionskorupion Services Provider

    @ralf said:
    Those network results are slow as treacle as well. It'll take an eternity to fill up those disks!

    Ignore the network, this server is still at my house, and that connection is a residential connection. The end plan is to find some nice place to send this server off to some DC.

    Thanked by (1)ralf
  • skorupionskorupion Services Provider

    @HostSlick said:

    @skorupion said:
    Here is a little bit of YABS, after i got 8x 1.2 TB SAS disks:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2023-03-24                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Apr 19 04:31:57 PM UTC 2023
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 5 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz
    CPU cores  : 32 @ 1300.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 251.8 GiB
    Swap       : 8.0 GiB
    Disk       : 4.3 TiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-70-generic
    VM Type    : NONE
    Net Online : IPv4
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Netia SA
    ASN        : AS12741 Netia SA
    Host       : Netia SA
    Location   : Wroclaw, Lower Silesia (02)
    Country    : Poland
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 18.71 MB/s    (4.6k) | 99.18 MB/s    (1.5k)
    Write      | 18.72 MB/s    (4.6k) | 99.70 MB/s    (1.5k)
    Total      | 37.43 MB/s    (9.3k) | 198.89 MB/s   (3.1k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 287.60 MB/s    (561) | 361.13 MB/s    (352)
    Write      | 302.88 MB/s    (591) | 385.18 MB/s    (376)
    Total      | 590.49 MB/s   (1.1k) | 746.31 MB/s    (728)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 121 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec   | 51.1 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 122 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 33.5 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 122 Mbits/sec   | 929 Mbits/sec   | 25.8 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 116 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 110 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 116 Mbits/sec   | 296 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 114 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 157 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 35.0 Mbits/sec  | busy            | 186 ms
    
    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2764
    Multi Core      | 31564
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/16744761
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 612
    Multi Core      | 8711
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/21083022
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 542
    Multi Core      | 4084
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/974556
    
    YABS completed in 21 min 14 sec
    

    Yes its not a bad server but in my opinion the old HP ProLiant DL380 Gen8 is not worth it anymore.
    At least the SFF you have for 2,5" disks
    Now you waste alot of space (2U) when you can use at your Specs the 1U DL360p or DL360e Gen8 with 8x 2,5" as well

    Its only worth it if you use the DL380 Gen8 LFF with high storage disks. Then you will find alot of people buying it for their storage needs for much much higher prices. Even if its old server. If you have enough bandwidth as well.

    Now that you need only 2U space and not planning to colocate more then one, you have alot of costs compared to a Half or Full Rack with more servers while you maybe get 120-150€ for it if you dont want it to bite dust in the rack until someone pays 150€.+

    And in EU you have high power pricing now. Thats the problem besides its getting old.

    Its just my honest advice for you. Dont take it wrong. You asked how many this can get you. Heres the answer.

    I have the HP gen8 as well between the newer models. Any of them. Blade systems like the C7000 and S6500 included. I dont invest into it more anymore. Even E5v2.

    It's not fully about the CPU, I'll upgrade it to something like dual E5-2697 v2, But the thing that, in my opinion, will get the people's attention is the amount of RAM. If I were to rent it out @ 150EUR p/m, then this would equate to about $0.67 per GB per month, which is hard to find, and with that CPU upgrade, only hetzner will be basically able to match that in Europe, and I could still probably rent it out for much much more

  • skorupionskorupion Services Provider

    @skorupion said:

    @HostSlick said:

    @skorupion said:
    Here is a little bit of YABS, after i got 8x 1.2 TB SAS disks:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2023-03-24                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Apr 19 04:31:57 PM UTC 2023
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 5 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz
    CPU cores  : 32 @ 1300.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 251.8 GiB
    Swap       : 8.0 GiB
    Disk       : 4.3 TiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-70-generic
    VM Type    : NONE
    Net Online : IPv4
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Netia SA
    ASN        : AS12741 Netia SA
    Host       : Netia SA
    Location   : Wroclaw, Lower Silesia (02)
    Country    : Poland
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 18.71 MB/s    (4.6k) | 99.18 MB/s    (1.5k)
    Write      | 18.72 MB/s    (4.6k) | 99.70 MB/s    (1.5k)
    Total      | 37.43 MB/s    (9.3k) | 198.89 MB/s   (3.1k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 287.60 MB/s    (561) | 361.13 MB/s    (352)
    Write      | 302.88 MB/s    (591) | 385.18 MB/s    (376)
    Total      | 590.49 MB/s   (1.1k) | 746.31 MB/s    (728)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 121 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec   | 51.1 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 122 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 33.5 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 122 Mbits/sec   | 929 Mbits/sec   | 25.8 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 116 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 110 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 116 Mbits/sec   | 296 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 114 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 157 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 35.0 Mbits/sec  | busy            | 186 ms
    
    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2764
    Multi Core      | 31564
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/16744761
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 612
    Multi Core      | 8711
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/21083022
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 542
    Multi Core      | 4084
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/974556
    
    YABS completed in 21 min 14 sec
    

    Yes its not a bad server but in my opinion the old HP ProLiant DL380 Gen8 is not worth it anymore.
    At least the SFF you have for 2,5" disks
    Now you waste alot of space (2U) when you can use at your Specs the 1U DL360p or DL360e Gen8 with 8x 2,5" as well

    Its only worth it if you use the DL380 Gen8 LFF with high storage disks. Then you will find alot of people buying it for their storage needs for much much higher prices. Even if its old server. If you have enough bandwidth as well.

    Now that you need only 2U space and not planning to colocate more then one, you have alot of costs compared to a Half or Full Rack with more servers while you maybe get 120-150€ for it if you dont want it to bite dust in the rack until someone pays 150€.+

    And in EU you have high power pricing now. Thats the problem besides its getting old.

    Its just my honest advice for you. Dont take it wrong. You asked how many this can get you. Heres the answer.

    I have the HP gen8 as well between the newer models. Any of them. Blade systems like the C7000 and S6500 included. I dont invest into it more anymore. Even E5v2.

    It's not fully about the CPU, I'll upgrade it to something like dual E5-2697 v2, But the thing that, in my opinion, will get the people's attention is the amount of RAM. If I were to rent it out @ 150EUR p/m, then this would equate to about $0.67 per GB per month, which is hard to find, and with that CPU upgrade, only hetzner will be basically able to match that in Europe, and I could still probably rent it out for much much more

    Also, looking at Geekbench (which is just an estimate AF), dual E5-2697 v2 is pretty much equal to the amount of juice in a ryzen 9 5950X (maybe like a core less) in multi-core results

  • typicalGtatypicalGta Hosting Provider

    $7/yr

  • I'll go 8$/one time fee.

    XR Developer | https://redironlabs.com

  • HostSlickHostSlick Hosting Provider
    edited April 2023

    @skorupion said:

    @HostSlick said:

    @skorupion said:
    Here is a little bit of YABS, after i got 8x 1.2 TB SAS disks:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2023-03-24                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Apr 19 04:31:57 PM UTC 2023
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 5 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz
    CPU cores  : 32 @ 1300.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 251.8 GiB
    Swap       : 8.0 GiB
    Disk       : 4.3 TiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS
    Kernel     : 5.15.0-70-generic
    VM Type    : NONE
    Net Online : IPv4
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Netia SA
    ASN        : AS12741 Netia SA
    Host       : Netia SA
    Location   : Wroclaw, Lower Silesia (02)
    Country    : Poland
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 18.71 MB/s    (4.6k) | 99.18 MB/s    (1.5k)
    Write      | 18.72 MB/s    (4.6k) | 99.70 MB/s    (1.5k)
    Total      | 37.43 MB/s    (9.3k) | 198.89 MB/s   (3.1k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 287.60 MB/s    (561) | 361.13 MB/s    (352)
    Write      | 302.88 MB/s    (591) | 385.18 MB/s    (376)
    Total      | 590.49 MB/s   (1.1k) | 746.31 MB/s    (728)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 121 Mbits/sec   | 913 Mbits/sec   | 51.1 ms
    Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 122 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 33.5 ms
    NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 122 Mbits/sec   | 929 Mbits/sec   | 25.8 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 116 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 110 ms
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 116 Mbits/sec   | 296 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms
    Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 114 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 157 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 35.0 Mbits/sec  | busy            | 186 ms
    
    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2764
    Multi Core      | 31564
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/16744761
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 612
    Multi Core      | 8711
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/21083022
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 542
    Multi Core      | 4084
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/974556
    
    YABS completed in 21 min 14 sec
    

    Yes its not a bad server but in my opinion the old HP ProLiant DL380 Gen8 is not worth it anymore.
    At least the SFF you have for 2,5" disks
    Now you waste alot of space (2U) when you can use at your Specs the 1U DL360p or DL360e Gen8 with 8x 2,5" as well

    Its only worth it if you use the DL380 Gen8 LFF with high storage disks. Then you will find alot of people buying it for their storage needs for much much higher prices. Even if its old server. If you have enough bandwidth as well.

    Now that you need only 2U space and not planning to colocate more then one, you have alot of costs compared to a Half or Full Rack with more servers while you maybe get 120-150€ for it if you dont want it to bite dust in the rack until someone pays 150€.+

    And in EU you have high power pricing now. Thats the problem besides its getting old.

    Its just my honest advice for you. Dont take it wrong. You asked how many this can get you. Heres the answer.

    I have the HP gen8 as well between the newer models. Any of them. Blade systems like the C7000 and S6500 included. I dont invest into it more anymore. Even E5v2.

    It's not fully about the CPU, I'll upgrade it to something like dual E5-2697 v2, But the thing that, in my opinion, will get the people's attention is the amount of RAM. If I were to rent it out @ 150EUR p/m, then this would equate to about $0.67 per GB per month, which is hard to find, and with that CPU upgrade, only hetzner will be basically able to match that in Europe, and I could still probably rent it out for much much more

    Yes you can get 150€
    But if I am (or any other host) is aggressive for the customer , I can do it at 75€/m or less. I can do v3/v4 with DDR4 at this at 150€ easy.

    You need to think about your competition when renting this out.

    It's a old gen8 server you can buy for arround 300 euro at my supplier.
    It's as I said.

  • @skorupion said: dual E5-2697 v2 is pretty much equal to the amount of juice in a ryzen 9 5950X

    Mate, are you trolling rn?

    Dual E5-2697 v2 is maybe half of that Ryzen if you measure the juice in ANY way.
    I mean, besides literal core counting, how exactly did you compare them to come to that conclusion?

Sign In or Register to comment.