WHMCS 8 - coming soon
InceptionHosting
Hosting ProviderOG
I did wonder what made them suddenly start replying to 7-year-old feature requests with tons of community support all of a sudden.
So who wants to take some guesses at what WHMCS 8 will mean.
The top fears are:
- Broken 3rd party modules
- A loss of yet more reporting
- Admin dashboard gets even less worth having
- They still insist on asking for nameservers for dedicated and virtual server signups confusing customers for the last 10 years.
The top hopes are:
- The daily automation reports are back in a human-readable format.
- They finally accept that users being able to change currency is important and implement.
- They remove the nameserver requirements for VPS/dedicated.
- better solusvm integration now they are owned by the same parent company much like they did for cpanel.
Any wants/bets?
https://inceptionhosting.com
Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.
Thanked by (1)webcraft
Comments
A full redesign of the admin area especially is long overdue, the client area could do with a good makeover as well.
SolusVM is a dead horse and will get absolutely 0 attention, Solus.io on the other hand, i’ll be surprised if they don’t come up with some good integration between them there at some point. (More likely Solus will release their WHMCS module for WHMCS 8 only).
Clouveo - SSD/NVMe Cloud VPS & Hosting
Performance & AMD EPYC Cloud | DDoS Protected | Snapshots | Auto Backups
I am not so sure about that, solusvm v1 currently and probably for the foreseeable future in the sole source of income for the solus brand, given what minor tweaks could do for improvement with minimal effort I would hope to see some updates on the WHMCS side but time will tell.
https://inceptionhosting.com
Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.
Free NAT KVM | Free NAT LXC
But I like reading the "what do I write for ns1 and ns2" posts
VPS reviews and benchmarks |
delete
You can hide the ns1-ns2
For example
using the standard_cart/configureproduct.tpl, you could replace the nameserver code with
<input type="hidden" name="ns1prefix" class="form-control" id="inputNs1prefix" value="ns1">
<input type="hidden" name="ns2prefix" class="form-control" id="inputNs2prefix" value="ns2">
If you only wanted to remove it for some dedicated server or vps products, you could use an {if} statement and specify the ones to ask for nameservers, but the above should remove it for all of your products.
I have seen variations of that solution posted a number of times, I tried it a literal age ago and it caused issues with something or other, I genuinely forget what now that ultimately made it impossible for some customers to complete orders, obviously a disaster.
I was not alone in that, coupled with every minor update reverting it, its a pain to manage at best.
https://inceptionhosting.com
Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.
The problem is most leave the value=""> blank. It needs something there for the order to go forward. That is why we just use ns1 and ns2 and it works without any issues.
Do you have any custom products setup using the "No module" option?
https://inceptionhosting.com
Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.
End of life time licenses.
Francisco
Price hike as well?
Recommend: MyRoot.PW|BuyVM|Inception Hosting|Prometeus
No I dont.
WHMCS will start charging per core of any servers you use to provision clients on. Have a cPanel server with 6 cores? That's $30/m. Have three SolusVM slaves with 32 cores? That's $160/m.
ExtraVM - High RAM Specials
Yours truly.
They have said there will be good integration with WHMCS, as well as the option to bill from inside Solus via WHMCS module - but they didn't tell me which version that was for (it was in the TODO for SolusIO anyway).
Here is my take,
Lifetime will stay but, no more option to purchase upgrades/supports without switching to their new price scheme. And/or, expensive support extension, which will make it not worth while. Not to mention, introduction of hostbill like setup, where if you miss one version, no more upgrade to the next one.
Price hike? May or may not happen to that extent, but probably something like 10 cents per users or so.
Nexus Bytes Ryzen Powered NVMe VPS | NYC|Miami|LA|London|Netherlands| Singapore|Tokyo
Storage VPS | LiteSpeed Powered Web Hosting + SSH access | Switcher Special |
Would be nice to turn off "features"... cough* SSL monitoring *cough
HostUS | OpenVZ & KVM VPS in 10 worldwide locations with our own Breeze Panel!
This is what I used until I changed templates and forgot to add the code back in.
??♂️
https://clients.mrvm.net
I think they'll do like ubersmith did and put 'you cant upgrade past this without enrolling in the new licensing model'.
They would remove the unlimited option and charge a flat fee for all active users. I also see the price going up as the "1000 active" is $0.02/user/month. I see that going to $0.10 - $0.20, maybe even more (maybe a per service fee?).
Francisco
The problem is not just name servers but even with hostname, if a customer does not enters a valid hostname it also won't proceed further, also it won't allow you to use same hostname twice in the order form, I mean if another vps exists with same hostname then too it won't allow that order (or at least that's what I remember)
We have hidden the hostname as well as name servers from the order form and just use a random hostname e.g. vps342342342.hosteons.com and ns1 and ns2 for name servers, this random hostname is generated using random number generator function.
hostEONS.com - Premium Ryzen VPS, Budget SSD KVM and OpenVZ7 VPS in LA, NY, Jacksonville - Florida, Las Vegas, Dalla, Direct Admin LiteSpeed SSD Web Hosting, etc.. Free Blesta License, Direct Admin License, Windows 2019 License and more
WHMCS 8.0 Beta is now available.
Sooner or later a price increase based on the cPanel model is going to happen & judging by the policies of VCs behind them I think they are going to ditch those with owned licenses in not very distant future. If you are an established provider, have been in this industry for 5+ years & your business generates a decent amount of revenue & you are or shall be looking to expand your offerings in near future then switch to something like HostBill. If you are new to the industry or you are an established host interested in offering shared & vps only then probably get an owned Blesta license.
Right now is the best time to switch because others might increase their prices once WHMCS do that.
Recommend: MyRoot.PW|BuyVM|Inception Hosting|Prometeus
VPS reviews and benchmarks |
In for the interest of what will end up happening....
PureVoltage - Custom Dedicated Servers Dual E5-2680v3 64gb ram 1TB nvme 100TB/10g $145
New York Colocation - Amazing pricing 1U-48U+
Why would this thread trigger a ban?
https://inceptionhosting.com
Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.
OP of WHMCS Beta 8 thread on LET got banned. Dunno why, but they allegedly were doing the dodgy with nulled shit.
MichaelCee
OP for the thread On LET (hostfactor) had a second account (Zuby something). Apparently zuby left good reviews for hostfactor.
Hf got banned. Not sure about the other
VPS reviews and benchmarks |
Yep. They already do that for new licenses but it has an 'unlimited' option at $50/month. Meh, but not jaw breaking.
What do you think the price goes to? I see them doing $0.50/month per active customer or similar.
Francisco
Do they really want to peg themselves like that? I wouldn't think so. I don't want to deal with switching... but I think many of us would switch at that point.
ExtraVM - High RAM Specials
Yours truly.
They have the numbers of what the real cpanel cancellation was in relation to revenue.
In a year I've only been able to cancel a single buyshared node. Basically anyone with 10 or 20 a accounts usually stayed. The main people the jumped ship had hundreds.
Blesta is ok but still a far ways away. Hostbill is maybe good but very costly. Thats it.
For us we would most likely start investing time into building some sort of billing into stallion.
Francisco
Yeah, in your case using Stallion for that would be great. Kinda wish I had done game servers and VPS separately for reasons like this and support.
ExtraVM - High RAM Specials
Yours truly.
Wouldn't it make sense to try to use Stripe and just integrate via some API calls to sort of get a decent billing setup (without having to rebuild everything)?