Hosthatch almost Black Friday offers

sgheghelesgheghele
in Must See Deals

Hope I’m not breaking any rules to paste this offer from @hosthatch that appeared in the other forum. Please don’t demand that they reply in here.
—-
Hi guys!

We have the following deals available in Amsterdam. We recently upgraded to 40 Gbps public and private networking in Amsterdam. Going to be upgrading other locations over the rest of this year.

1x 2.4+ GHz
512 MB RAM
250 GB disk
3 TB bandwidth
$35 per 2 years
https://manage.hosthatch.com/billing/order/ams-250g-storage

1x 2.4+ GHz
1 GB RAM (+ 1 GB for 2 years)
2 TB disk
6 TB bandwidth (+ 14 TB for 2 years)
$50 per year
https://manage.hosthatch.com/billing/order/ams-2tb-storage

2 CPU cores (50% dedicated, burstable up to 200%)
8 GB RAM
20 GB NVMe SSD (+10 GB for 2 years)
5 TB bandwidth (+10 TB for 2 years)
$35 per year
https://manage.hosthatch.com/billing/order/ams-8g-nvme

3 CPU cores (100% dedicated, burstable up to 300%)
16 GB RAM
50 GB NVMe SSD (+20 GB for 2 years)
10 TB bandwidth (+10 TB for 2 years)
$65 per year
https://manage.hosthatch.com/billing/order/ams-16g-nvme
Setup time: 3 working days after order.

Multiple plans can be stacked based on availability. Please inquire in advance at the time of ordering by opening a ticket. We have limited availability for these plans.

Any unpaid orders after 15 minutes will be cancelled and added back to available stock. All orders are final and cannot be refunded. We can also not offer location changes on these plans. Our flexibility is limited due to the discounted pricing. Please consider buying our standard packages from hosthatch.com if you are looking for more flexibility.

These offers will expire on 13th May (or earlier if the stock is sold out).

Thank you everyone!

Thanked by (4)beagle Ympker mikho Tech2

Comments

  • YmpkerYmpker OGContent Writer

    Some good offers! Thanks for sharing mate :)

    Thanked by (1)sgheghele

    Ympker's VPN LTD Comparison, Uptime.is, Ympker's GitHub.

  • chocolateshirtchocolateshirt OG

    Great, I would like to buy one, but it seems some of my vps with them still idling..

    ⭕ A simple uptime dashboard using UptimeRobot API https://upy.duo.ovh
    ⭕ Currently using VPS from BuyVM, GreenCloudVPS, Gullo's, Hetzner, HostHatch, InceptionHosting, LetBox, MaxKVM, MrVM, VirMach.

  • FreekFreek

    Any YABS?

  • thagoatthagoat

    And they're gone

  • FreekFreek

    @Freek said:
    Any YABS?

    Copied from the OGF:

    1x 2.4+ GHz
    512 MB RAM
    250 GB disk
    3 TB bandwidth
    $35 per 2 years
    https://manage.hosthatch.com/billing/order/ams-250g-storage

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2020-12-29                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Wed 05 May 2021 10:05:23 PM EDT

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz
CPU cores  : 1 @ 2399.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 483.2 MiB
Swap       : 512.0 MiB
Disk       : 245.8 GiB

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 11.96 MB/s    (2.9k) | 73.38 MB/s    (1.1k)
Write      | 11.96 MB/s    (2.9k) | 73.77 MB/s    (1.1k)
Total      | 23.93 MB/s    (5.9k) | 147.16 MB/s   (2.2k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 201.56 MB/s    (393) | 205.35 MB/s    (200)
Write      | 212.27 MB/s    (414) | 219.03 MB/s    (213)
Total      | 413.84 MB/s    (807) | 424.39 MB/s    (413)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                |                           |                 |
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 3.12 Gbits/sec  | 2.15 Gbits/sec
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 3.48 Gbits/sec  | 1.95 Gbits/sec
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 3.22 Gbits/sec  | 2.96 Gbits/sec
Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 671 Mbits/sec   | 228 Mbits/sec
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.35 Gbits/sec  | 735 Mbits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 990 Mbits/sec   | 677 Mbits/sec
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 988 Mbits/sec   | 282 Mbits/sec
Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 172 Mbits/sec   | 435 Mbits/sec

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 563
Multi Core      | 573
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/7748803

    Credits: ColderCoder

    3 CPU cores (100% dedicated, burstable up to 300%)
    16 GB RAM
    50 GB NVMe SSD (+20 GB for 2 years)
    10 TB bandwidth (+10 TB for 2 years)
    $65 per year
    https://manage.hosthatch.com/billing/order/ams-16g-nvme

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2020-12-29                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Wed May  5 22:01:07 EDT 2021

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz
CPU cores  : 3 @ 2999.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 15.5 GiB
Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
Disk       : 48.2 GiB

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 259.75 MB/s  (64.9k) | 1.87 GB/s    (29.2k)
Write      | 260.43 MB/s  (65.1k) | 1.88 GB/s    (29.4k)
Total      | 520.19 MB/s (130.0k) | 3.75 GB/s    (58.7k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 3.25 GB/s     (6.3k) | 3.22 GB/s     (3.1k)
Write      | 3.42 GB/s     (6.6k) | 3.44 GB/s     (3.3k)
Total      | 6.67 GB/s    (13.0k) | 6.66 GB/s     (6.5k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                |                           |                 |
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 3.96 Gbits/sec  | 3.19 Gbits/sec
Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 7.97 Gbits/sec  | 4.84 Gbits/sec
WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 12.9 Gbits/sec  | 2.46 Gbits/sec
Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 834 Mbits/sec   | 22.4 Mbits/sec
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.61 Gbits/sec  | 2.22 Gbits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 1.60 Gbits/sec  | 1.53 Gbits/sec
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.28 Gbits/sec  | 1.06 Gbits/sec
Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 177 Mbits/sec   | 805 Mbits/sec

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 680
Multi Core      | 1893
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/7748734

    Credits: miu

    @thagoat said:
    And they're gone

    Storage plans are gone, 8GB and 16GB ones are still in stock.

    Personally I'm passing on these ones. The 16GB one is attractive, but the 8GB one is a little low on disk space imho.

    Thanked by (1)ivysaur
  • debaserdebaser OG

    @Freek said: 12.9 Gbits/sec

  • FreekFreek

    @debaser said:

    @Freek said: 12.9 Gbits/sec

    Definitely, but sadly CPU isn't the fastest one. Quite an old model tbh.

  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King

    @Freek said:

    @debaser said:

    @Freek said: 12.9 Gbits/sec

    Definitely, but sadly CPU isn't the fastest one. Quite an old model tbh.

    HH did explain before why they use 2690v1 and v2 mostly. to keep costs low and contention ratio reasonable.

    looking at some comments on racknerd ryzens having high steal, HH might not be wrong.

    Thanked by (2)skorous lentro

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • FreekFreek

    @cybertech said:

    @Freek said:

    @debaser said:

    @Freek said: 12.9 Gbits/sec

    Definitely, but sadly CPU isn't the fastest one. Quite an old model tbh.

    HH did explain before why they use 2690v1 and v2 mostly. to keep costs low and contention ratio reasonable.

    looking at some comments on racknerd ryzens having high steal, HH might not be wrong.

    But isn't that due to RackNerd overloading their nodes?

  • lentrolentro Hosting Provider

    @Freek said: overloading their nodes

    They can only do that to sustain their pricing. If they didn't overload their nodes, they would prob need to double their pricing. So what do you want... 2690v1/v2 where you can use all of it with ease or slow Ryzens? I think HH has the right strategy.

    Thanked by (3)cybertech Ouji bdl
  • tetechtetech OG

    @Freek said:

    @cybertech said:

    @Freek said:

    @debaser said:

    @Freek said: 12.9 Gbits/sec

    Definitely, but sadly CPU isn't the fastest one. Quite an old model tbh.

    HH did explain before why they use 2690v1 and v2 mostly. to keep costs low and contention ratio reasonable.

    looking at some comments on racknerd ryzens having high steal, HH might not be wrong.

    But isn't that due to RackNerd overloading their nodes?

    I think the argument (whether right or wrong) went along the lines that a new CPU provider will have to extract more $ from the node due to the higher processor cost, which is somewhat inflated due to the "newness" factor, and that is either recouped by higher prices or eventually cramming more onto the node. Thus their argument is that others will out-perform initially but check back in two years and see what the story is. Or maybe 6 months in the case of Rack Nerd.

    Thanked by (1)cybertech
  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King
    edited May 2021

    also Ryzens are limited to 128GB ram. to keep the same profitability Vs performance , it's inevitable that prices have to be higher.

    I paid EUR 45 for a smashing 4vCPU 3900X with AlphaVPS, but it comes "only" with 3GB ram and 6mths later still performs tip top. they got the ratios right.

    Thanked by (1)Freek

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • FreekFreek

    @lentro said:

    @Freek said: overloading their nodes

    They can only do that to sustain their pricing. If they didn't overload their nodes, they would prob need to double their pricing. So what do you want... 2690v1/v2 where you can use all of it with ease or slow Ryzens? I think HH has the right strategy.

    This escalated quickly and I'm not really following you to be honest. How about neither one? A balanced approach is doable, enough providers do so.

    Thanked by (1)lentro
  • sgheghelesgheghele

    @cybertech said: HH did explain before why they use 2690v1 and v2 mostly. to keep costs low and contention ratio reasonable.

    looking at some comments on racknerd ryzens having high steal, HH might not be wrong.

    I have 4 VPS with Hosthatch (2x storage, 2x NVMe), all of which are in production use since I bought them during their Black Friday promotion. I remember Abdullah stating that they want to offer predictable performance that stays constant over time. One way to achieve this is to use older hardware but limit overselling.

    For these six months, I can gladly confirm their strategy. Computation and I/O have remained the same on all four VPS. I am quite satisfied with them.

    Thanked by (3)cybertech Ouji hosthatch
  • fragpicfragpic OG

    @sgheghele said: Computation and I/O have remained the same on all four VPS. I am quite satisfied with them.

    My experience has been the same too. I have services from other providers that bench much higher but are never consistent, but HH has been super consistent for the last 3 years I've been with them.

    Thanked by (3)cybertech hosthatch bdl
  • FreekFreek
    edited May 2021

    Oh don't get me wrong, HH is an amazing provider. My storage VPS with them has been rock solid for the past 8 months, so no complains there :)

    Thanked by (1)hosthatch
  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King

    waiting for HH to upgrade LAX to 40G

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • mikhomikho AdministratorHosting ProviderOG

    Wish something similar in Sweden.
    Would be perfect with 1-2 when doing work for my customers who requires dedicated environment.

    https://clients.mrvm.net

  • hosthatchhosthatch Hosting Provider

    @Freek said:
    This escalated quickly and I'm not really following you to be honest. How about neither one? A balanced approach is doable, enough providers do so.

    I know I am not the most unbiased source on this, but here's the thing...

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/search?utf8=✓&q=vultr
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/search?utf8=✓&q=digitalocean

    Compare our ~$5/mo (promotional) plan with DO/Vultr's $5/mo plan. Ours comes with a higher CPU benchmark score (even with a much older CPU), and then you also get 16 times more RAM and more bandwidth.

    The only big provider I know who actually scores really good on CPUs consistently and uses the latest CPUs is Hetzner cloud.

    I am happy to debate this, but then please, let's factor in real-world benchmarks and performance scores instead of CPU models. At the end of the day, is it really worth it to see the latest CPU model that is 100 times faster, but is also 200 times more contended?

    @mikho said:
    Wish something similar in Sweden.
    Would be perfect with 1-2 when doing work for my customers who requires dedicated environment.

    We've already negotiated the 40G uplinks, just have to install new NICs and switches there, so should be in the next few months. :)

  • mikhomikho AdministratorHosting ProviderOG

    @hosthatch said:

    @mikho said:
    Wish something similar in Sweden.
    Would be perfect with 1-2 when doing work for my customers who requires dedicated environment.

    We've already negotiated the 40G uplinks, just have to install new NICs and switches there, so should be in the next few months. :)

    A good 8 gb deal with decent amount of disk would tickle my interest.

    https://clients.mrvm.net

  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King

    a storage plan in between 250GB and 2TB would be equally enticing as well.

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • ehabehab Content Writer
    edited May 2021

    we'll

    Thanked by (3)_MS_ cybertech bdl
  • ivysaurivysaur

    @cybertech said:

    @Freek said:

    @debaser said:

    @Freek said: 12.9 Gbits/sec

    Definitely, but sadly CPU isn't the fastest one. Quite an old model tbh.

    HH did explain before why they use 2690v1 and v2 mostly. to keep costs low and contention ratio reasonable.

    looking at some comments on racknerd ryzens having high steal, HH might not be wrong.

    grabbed the racknerd ryzen, cpu steal can be anywhere from 1% to 30%. can confirm

    Thanked by (1)cybertech
  • dosaidosai OG

    @cybertech said:
    a storage plan in between 250GB and 2TB would be equally enticing as well.

    This. 1TB plan please.

    Thanked by (1)cybertech
Sign In or Register to comment.

© LowEndSpirit 2024

ipv6 ready