Any experience with M2 Nvme SSD drives?
I have the B450-TUF-Gaming mainboard ( https://www.asus.com/Motherboards-Components/Motherboards/TUF-Gaming/TUF-B450-PLUS-GAMING/ ).
It is my understanding that I can use M2 Nvme SSD drives with that mainboard.
I have never used them before, but from previous SSD experience would look towards Samsung (Evo) and/or Crucial.
I just found the Crucial P2 CT1000P2SSD8 1TB on Amazon for 93€. Maybe it will even go down a bit more on BF. Does anyone have any experience with this particular drive, or can recommend others?
It's going to be used mostly for gaming related stuff.
Comments
I'm stupid, lazy and broke, so I'd go with the (probably the most expensive) Samsung.
From what I could gather, their NVMe drives are as reliable as their SSDs (had a lot of experience with those).
Life's too short to worry about crappy hardware. And it ends up being more costly in the long run.
Detailed info about providers whose services I've used:
BikeGremlin web-hosting reviews
The MoBo supports PCI express 3.0.
Do look up Adata and Seagate.
Kingston for LE compliance.
I use the latter two in addition to Crucial
Samsung is prem but if mobo does not support then you will get sub optimised performance
VPS reviews and benchmarks |
this MB supports NVMe Gen 3x4 which mainstream now.
samsung 970 evo should suffice.
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
I've had a QLC crucial drive once, it's terrible.
If the SLC cache is full it's, in the base case, as fast as an HDD.
The brands don't really matter, there are just a hand full of chip manufactures and all of them are all right.
Just be sure to buy a SLC (damn expensive), MLC (expensive) or TLC (best price-performance ratio) drive with DDR cache.
I also had the TUF B450 and I sent it back after some days, but I don't remember the reason for it.
Sure, you can use a NVMe PCIe drive with it. But be sure to order one with a PCIe interface, there are still NVMe drives with a SATA3 interface out there.
https://duck.com (aff)
https://ecosia.org (aff) Plant trees from home.
"If you are not paying for a product then you are the product."
Crucial P2 is dram-less, I suggest a2000 for lowend nvme.
Action and Reaction in history
If you just play games, you won't see much of a difference with M.2 NVMe compared to standard SATA SSD's. The time it takes to boot your system and play games will be the exact same with a SATA SSD. So, if you already have SATA SSD's, just use them as there is most likely no need to upgrade to an M.2 NVMe. If you don't already have any SATA SSD's that you can use, then go ahead and order an M.2.
M.2 NVMe SSD's are fine, but there are things to watch out for. Particularly, avoid NVMe drives that are cheap and use crappy controllers (this also applies to regular SATA SSD's, don't order SATA SSD's with crappy controllers). Sometimes, NVMe drives that use crappy hardware can result in terrible performance (sometimes even worse than HDD iirc). Watch out for what controllers they are using. I would suggest going with the Samsung 970 Evo if that is an option in your country.
FroCDN Files - Anonymously upload up to 15GB per file for free with unlimited bandwidth. FroCDN Paste - Paste text to share with others, fork of Hastebin. Also completely free to use.
Don't forget the DRAM vs DRAM-less debate is way less important on NVMe. Nearly all modern DRAM-less NVMe implement HMB, they can call back over the PCI bus and use the hosts memory for the jobs that local DRAM would assist. Something not possible for SATA SSDs which do suffer badly.
And as for the slowness of QLC devices once their SLC cache fills (HDD performance), that only really manifests itself writing huge volumes quickly i.e. many 10s of GBs in one go. For most users that's a very rare event worthy of making a coffee, sure installing a 100GB game will take a while longer, once, but playing it will be no different. There is a performance hit, and it 'might' be worth paying extra to avoid, but IMHO the problems are overstated, cheapness is probably still the key metric for regular users.
This was what I thought too and it was the reason I bought the QLC crucial p2 drive. The SLC cache (of this drive) is part of the whole drive's storage, if you fill the drive with more than 80% of data you won't have any SLC cache. As far as I understood they only use QL cells but for performance (while possible) the QL cells are used like an MLC.
In my case the slowdown was damn huge, sometimes my OS (Windows) stuck for 10-20 seconds (10-20 seconds average response time) and the file transfer rate went down to 15-45MB.
https://duck.com (aff)
https://ecosia.org (aff) Plant trees from home.
"If you are not paying for a product then you are the product."
A guy who once saw a guy who once held a NVMe told me that heat is also a thing to consider.
Performance drops (along with longevity) with extra heat. Depending on the motherboard (where the port is placed), housing, and drive's heat-pipes (if they are mounted) you can have better, or not so good performance, regardless of the storage model used.
Haven't put that to the test, my comp is almost 10-years old and SSD is as far as it will go (for it to make any sense whatsoever).
Detailed info about providers whose services I've used:
BikeGremlin web-hosting reviews
Vaguely recall crucial recently being in the news for substituting inferior controller chips recently. Def for the WD SN550s...but not 100% sure on the Crucials....
Yeah they don't like getting super hot. I personally think the effect is exaggerated but haven't tested it. Under normal use you won't really max them all the time anyway...and if you are really saturating 2000mbps+ routinely then maybe a mid tier consumer device isn't the way to go anyway
@cochon said:
100 GB game ?
@bikegremlin nvme heats up. My laptop was running very hot under the Seagate NVMe till I replaced the adapter. Still does to an extent. If the ‘2 disk is used External then Also runs hot on usb enclosure. Aluminium casing helps.
Some reading : https://www.maketecheasier.com/does-nvme-ssd-need-heatsink
VPS reviews and benchmarks |
Sure, Grand Theft Auto 5 is about that size, and it's from 2013.
Not really my thing, but Epic Games gave it away free earlier in the year, hence how I know. I'd assume modern games are bigger still.
Buying ssd in 2021 is a huge risk all manufacturers including samsung done the bait and switch,but , try searching on LTT forum and reddit
Want free vps ? https://microlxc.net
Ssd with dram produce more heat /consume more power but , if it's desktop I don't think you will run into any problems
Want free vps ? https://microlxc.net
Last game I played was Age of Empires in 2013. So I am hopelessly outdated
VPS reviews and benchmarks |
AoE 4 with 4k & HDR is ~220GB small.
https://duck.com (aff)
https://ecosia.org (aff) Plant trees from home.
"If you are not paying for a product then you are the product."
Thank you all for the feedback! It is much appreciated
I will look through it tomorrow, though. It's been a long day.
Ympker's VPN LTD Comparison, Uptime.is, Ympker's GitHub.
I've got a cheap micron one that I picked up second hand - works fine for my spare desktop (via pci-e adapter) for what it cost. Otherwise I've used samsung ones and no issues.
ADATA is the brand to watch out for when it comes to switching components after sending to mass production. They switched components in the SX8200 more than a year ago before the whole supply chain issues started. Crucial and Samsung were both caught recently switching components, although ADATA and Crucial didn't change the packaging, but Samsung did to identify the different hardware.
Crucial claimed that the specs they posted for the drive were based on TLC speeds even though they didn't start production using TLC components and only recently switched components, that still met their original specs.
Samsung changed the controller in the 970 Evo Plus and the old model number is MZVLB1T0HBLR and the new part number is MZVL21T0HBLU. They switched out the Phoenix controller for the new Elpis controller, which is the same one used on the 980 Pro.
Ah, I stand corrected, I also have one of the Crucial P2's which seemed to be the model most criticised, and yet it works fine for me, even doing large transfers, hence my scepticism about reported issues. BUT a bit of research turns up that the early models actually used TLC memory, they later switched to QLC, and others seem to have similar experiences to you due to the switch. Looks like I dodged a bullet.
I never ventured beyond AOE2. Single CD :-)
VPS reviews and benchmarks |
That was the best AoE
. MS has released a remastered AoE2 though.
That was the last one I played. Is the remastered version still good?
Same here. My last Windows machine back in the noughties wasn't powerful enough to play AoE3 and thus AoE2 was the last of AoE for me
. The original AoE2 still runs flawlessly on Wine though. Haven't played the remastered one yet.
Edit: Looks like there is a new AoE out now - AoE4.
Yeah, AoE 4 is very new, still. For me, AoE2 has been the last AoE, too. Maybe I'll try AoE 4, though
Ympker's VPN LTD Comparison, Uptime.is, Ympker's GitHub.
Yes they did it. However 1TB drives still have best controller. I'm using sx8200 pro 1tb and works as intended.
whatever you get make sure to get a heatsink they get silly hot and can fail as a result
I've got a 2TB Samsung 980 Pro in my PC and it's very fast, but the Samsung Evos are good too.
A lot of newer motherboards come with a heatsink. I've got an "ASUS ROG Strix B550-F Gaming" and it came with a heatsink for both m.2 sockets.
Daniel15 | https://d.sb/. List of all my VPSes: https://d.sb/servers
dnstools.ws - DNS lookups, pings, and traceroutes from 30 locations worldwide.