# wg-quick up wg0
[#] ip link add wg0 type wireguard
RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported
Unable to access interface: Protocol not supported
[#] ip link delete dev wg0
Cannot find device "wg0"

Is it impossible to run wireguard in these containers or is it a PEBKAC issue? Do you recommend any of the userspace wireguard implementations and, if so, which?

Inception Hosting acquired by Clouvider Limited
After many months of friendly discussion and negotiation Inception Hosting has been bought by Clouvider Limited. Inception Hosting will continue to operate as a separate company. You will see no changes, the invoices, payments and your contract(s) remain with Inception Hosting Limited.

The history of Inception Hosting
Inception Hosting started from humble beginnings back in 2011 in part because I Anthony Smith, previous owner and director of Inception Hosting was as a service user frustrated with a lack of quality of service and care in the budget side of the market. Having spent a lot of years running enterprise-grade technical service desks and doing so to a high standard I knew it would not take much to provide a great alternative to many of the other hosts out there with a "you get what you pay for" frame of mind when it came to support and quality because usually, you did not even get that.

It brought me great pleasure to generate a reputation as a stable, competent affordable yet quality hosting option in the budget end of the market often getting favourably compared to significantly more expensive option. However, in truth it has taken years and years of 12+ hour days, 7 days a week rarely with a day off for the last 10 years to get it to the stage it is at now.

What does the future hold?
With trends changing and significant development needed to innovate and advance the future offers available to customers; new and old, that meant some investment was needed in order to take things to the next level rather than tread water for years to come.

Because Clouvider is already the trusted backend to over 70% of Inception Hosting's servers and often publicly acknowledged as a very high-quality network and server provider themselves with their demand for high standards and quality above all else it just made sense from my perspective for Inception Hosting to be absorbed by Clouvider in order to give it and Inception Hosting customers the best possible chance of being where it needs to be within the market over the next 10 years and it will be exciting to make available services from Inception Hosting in other Clouvider locations.

Many customers have now trusted Inception Hosting for a full 10 years and I am very excited for the future, I really believe this was the best move to position Inception Hosting where it needs to be to take the service and quality to the next level. To be clear Inception Hosting did not need to be sold, nothing was ever at risk this was a mutual meeting of minds, discussions took place over the best part of a year and both sides felt comfortable about the idea right away.

Is Anthony staying onboard?
Yes! I will remain active, employed now directly by Clouvider and part of my primary responsibilities will be to continue to look after Inception Hosting so not a huge amount will change for customers in the short/medium term although some new names may pop up on the support desk.

I have a question...
If you have any questions or queries about this acquisition then please do not hesitate to
get in touch with us.

Kind Regards,
Anthony Smith,
Team Inception Hosting

root@mylocalmachine:~# ping -f [we still don't post IPs, right?].98 
PING 56(84) bytes of data.
................^C   
--- ping statistics ---
214 packets transmitted, 198 received, 7,47664% packet loss, time 3361ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 242.600/278.443/320.271/17.202 ms, pipe 21, ipg/ewma 15.780/252.115 ms

it's similar to/from other euro machines in various directions, here's to OVH for example over IPv6, no difference really

root@LESVPS:~# ping -f my.machine.in.ovh
PING 56 data bytes
......................................................................^C 
--- ping statistics ---
521 packets transmitted, 451 received, 13% packet loss, time 8398ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 157.012/160.179/197.734/4.014 ms, pipe 14, ipg/ewma 16.150/159.652 ms

once the connection is over the pond, it's perfect

root@LESVPS:~# ping -f 8.8.8.8
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.
.^C 
--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
752 packets transmitted, 751 received, 0% packet loss, time 10536ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 13.024/14.164/40.957/2.508 ms, pipe 4, ipg/ewma 14.029/16.485 ms

What's going on? Other LES nodes from Inception are fine but, obviously, the US proxy is most useful for getting around GDPR/cookie/geoIP nonsense.

I rented a KVM 500 DOUBLE from Anthony(inceptionhosting).

Due some internet issue's from my country ISP to Phoenix(USA) where the server is i have to sell it.
Bit unhappy due i'm very happy with the server specs for this price and the great service.

SPECS:
Server: KVM
Disk Space 1000 GB
Bandwidth 1000 GB
Memory 1 GB
IPv4 Address 1

Selling price: 50 euro
Next Due Date:
Monday, September 5th, 2022

Price : 25/Y when renewing.

Price is fixed*

Kind regards
GL

add tunnel "sit0" failed: No such device

I am using this command:
iptables -A OUTPUT -m string --string "vk.com" --algo kmp --to 65535 -p all -j REJECT

everything worked on the old version but now displays an error message:
iptables: No chain/target/match by that name.

How to fix it?

My Node: Mininode1b (NETHERLANDS)
My IP: 192.168.1.101