<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>web server — LowEndSpirit</title>
        <link>https://staging.lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 01:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>web server — LowEndSpirit</description>
    <atom:link href="https://staging.lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/discussions/tagged/web-server/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>Web server performance</title>
        <link>https://staging.lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/discussion/2036/web-server-performance</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 15:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>General</category>
        <dc:creator>flips</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">2036@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Was just searching for updated benchmarks and performance comparisons for webservers like nginx, h2o, Lighty, LiteSpeed and Caddy 2, but most hits I found was outdated or seemed to be wrong ...</p>

<p>Like <a rel="nofollow" href="https://http2benchmark.org/">this</a> can't be the full/correct picture?</p>

<p>One thing for testing would be serving static files and php etc.<br />
The other would be reverse proxy performance.<br />
Anyone know of better tests?<br />
(My use case is Lowend VPS'es serving low traffic sites. I can use either of these and be happy, I guess, just curious. I've been using them all, except h2o ...) <img src="https://staging.lowendspirit.com/plugins/emojiextender/emoji/twitter/smile.png" title=":)" alt=":)" height="18" /></p>
]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
