<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>wordpress backup — LowEndSpirit</title>
        <link>https://staging.lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 17:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>wordpress backup — LowEndSpirit</description>
    <atom:link href="https://staging.lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/discussions/tagged/wordpress-backup/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>Wordpress backup options- Good list and Updraft Plus vulnerability</title>
        <link>https://staging.lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/discussion/3789/wordpress-backup-options-good-list-and-updraft-plus-vulnerability</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 04:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>WordPress</category>
        <dc:creator>vyas</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">3789@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Saw this in the WP newsletter, thought of sharing since the topic comes up occasionally.</p>

<p><a href="https://wplift.com/best-wordpress-backup-plugins" rel="nofollow">https://wplift.com/best-wordpress-backup-plugins</a></p>

<p>They have not mentioned All In One WP Backup - my <em>former</em> preferred backup method. Interesting: reading the comments, looks like the article was originally published in 2016! Nice content refresh by these guys.</p>

<p>Also: Read about the Updraft Plus vulnerability<br />
<a href="https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2022/02/vulnerability-in-updraftplus-allowed-subscribers-to-download-sensitive-backups" rel="nofollow">https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2022/02/vulnerability-in-updraftplus-allowed-subscribers-to-download-sensitive-backups</a></p>
]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
