havoc
havoc
About
- Username
- havoc
- Joined
- Visits
- 315
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, OG
- Thanked
- 895
Comments
-
Using ext4. Mostly because single drive so didn't really see the point in extra complications. Might try ZFS on next complete rebuild. That'll hopefully be a way off though. And by then hopefully added more drives.
-
Don't care just for the love of all that is holy make the passwords consistent / sync'd. Don't want one for the home page, one for the management panel, one for the VNC and one for the SSH. Each with their own username confusing the hell out of pass…
-
(Quote) Minor update - the static site angle works much better. Basically: Domain name > CF DNS > Bunny CDN > Bunny storage Think I'll stick with it for hosting blogs (Gatsby). It'll effectively scale inifinitely for that given their pric…
-
Poor style naming & shaming before attempting to resolve it constructively
-
(Quote) Perhaps I misunderstood what bunny is - I guess I was expecting it to work similar to CF proxy-like nature. i.e. You just put it in between the internet and your server and it caches what it can. Bunny seems to be more for specific assets, …
-
(Quote) haha. I studied finance not IT so sometimes come at things from a different angle. @elliotc explanation makes sense though
-
Frustrated with this - significantly more convoluted than CF. All I want to do is put this between the domain name and the server. A transparent cache if you like. This seems more like edge storage copies of specific assets & you need to restru…
-
gmm...clearly the codes don't work equally for everyone...maybe country dependent?
-
Nice the GET5 worked for me. Not sure why flips had two work. Either way its a win
-
(Quote) Yeah I get that - can't be shared in the same way as mem/cpu from a technical perspective. Just not what I would have expected from a financial analysis perspective if you're looking to maximize profits (Theory of constraints and throughput…
-
Surprised people are saying disk is a limiting factor. I would have thought that's the one thing you can scale fairly independently of the rest of the server as needed. Adding more CPU to a mobo could be challenging though
-
FYI info above is wrong...to get the promo field to show you need to both confirm email AND update your billing (no CC)
-
2016 vintage thread haha
-
Can't see the topic about AUP reviews? Link? Honestly I don't particularly mind if it ends up at something like 20% sustained, 100% peak. Core count...is largely meaningless imo, though in this context having 5 vcpu makes it easier to cap somethin…
-
UK to NL/DE you won't feel. It's in the ~10ms range. Europe vs USA you'll definitely feel though. For SEO purposes - I guess it depends on where the search index spider is located. To be honest I don't think it matters <100ms
-
(Quote) Many thanks for the kind offer. I ended up just getting a bigger VPS. The whole DB on a rclone system just isn't going to work.
-
(Quote) Extra 20% on top for annual
-
(Quote) Was thinking about this too cause my ISP is native v6 but didn't want to add noise. On further thought...it's a minefield of miscommunication. Think 99% of the people would misunderstand this so would suggest implementing this as a negativ…
-
Neat. The combination of generous memory and nested virt makes buying something bigger very attractive for remote proxmox. Also appreciate the recurring discount part. Definitely grabbing one...just need to decide Entry-10G or Entry-12G. @seriesn …
-
(Quote) TBH trying to keep this as cheap/ghetto as possible since it won't make any profit. Think I may have found a solution though. Nexus has +100gb hdd for a very reasonable 1USD according to help articles. Just need to figure out why customizat…
-
(Quote) Yeah that makes sense unfortunately. It's chunked into 50mb files...but still...a write a second would mean 50mb written every sec. :/ Guess I need a different solution. Cheap storage VPS might work...but need lots of mem too :/
-
(Quote) Yes that kind of DB Only reason I'm considering it is because it's low value. Distributed node, so if something goes wrong I just delete it. i.e. It's fine if it fails 3 months in. Not so fine if it's 3 days cause hassle
-
(Quote) Thanks. Expecting this to be pretty low throughput frankly so that should be OK I think...just unsure whether a DB will be happy with a remote sketch backend like that
-
Not quite following. How is this different from main PVE? It main missing stuff for zen3 support?