@cgkings said:
The offending person's machine has been deleted, but, why the non-offending person's machine is still pending
Just making a guess here, but I would expect that given the number of nodes that went down during the sale and are now back up, I would expect VirMach considered making sure existing VMs were working a priority over getting pending VMs provisioned. I and others also still have pending VMs so your not alone.
@cgkings said:
The offending person's machine has been deleted, but, why the non-offending person's machine is still pending
Just making a guess here, but I would expect that given the number of nodes that went down during the sale and are now back up, I would expect VirMach considered making sure existing VMs were working a priority over getting pending VMs provisioned. I and others also still have pending VMs so your not alone.
Thanks for your help. I'm relieved to know that I'm not the only one with a pending machine,
I agree to deal with the existing machine failure. Because of perspective-taking, I don't like my machine failure behind new users
@cgkings said:
The offending person's machine has been deleted, but, why the non-offending person's machine is still pending
666
It comes to my mind delayed activation granted ya a window of opportunity that ya could cancel it if grabbed better deal at next year's FS
if it is unprovisioned until next year's FS, you would have to factor in losses in opportunity costs for:
not being able to use VPS in 2023
what if you did not get any better deal in 2024 FS, then make a ticket after the FS for 2023 unprovisioned service , and still get cancelled anyway? not being able to use any FS VPS in 2024 then.
@cybertech said: if it is unprovisioned until next year's FS, you would have to factor in losses in opportunity costs for:
not being able to use VPS in 2023
what if you did not get any better deal in 2024 FS, then make a ticket after the FS for 2023 unprovisioned service , and still get cancelled anyway? not being able to use any FS VPS in 2024 then.
That's gross if appending more than 6 months even at VirmArch's level. My maximum expectation is 3 months.
@emengweb said: Have a fake 6.66, with same price, but lower Core & Ram & everything ;p
1C 1.8G 15G....
This one? Still is no brainer, just not at family heirloom level
@localhost said: It failed for text too. But again what is the correct sequence? Enter the kickstart url and then select a method of install?
I've just tested and look like it just won't work on boxes with smaller ram. The base install.img is like 700MiB which dracut will always fail to work with.
And the ks url seems doesn't work at all even when I tested on a vm with 4GiB ram. Not sure what could be the problem.
Sorry I have given you such unreliable info.
It's not unreliable info. Something worth trying out as the netboot.xyz portrays as such. Thanks for your help!
@cybertech said: if it is unprovisioned until next year's FS, you would have to factor in losses in opportunity costs for:
not being able to use VPS in 2023
what if you did not get any better deal in 2024 FS, then make a ticket after the FS for 2023 unprovisioned service , and still get cancelled anyway? not being able to use any FS VPS in 2024 then.
That's gross if appending more than 6 months even at VirmArch's level. My maximum expectation is 3 months.
@emengweb said: Have a fake 6.66, with same price, but lower Core & Ram & everything ;p
1C 1.8G 15G....
This one? Still is no brainer, just not at family heirloom level
Sure, but 2 Core is little better for k3s, high available version of Virmach
@localhost said: So, whats the difference between this and what you were suggesting earlier?
basically using qemu locally etc, you are just writing a image of the drive to transfer, rather than using the drive attached.
for resizing your partition, use parted print to fix the partition table, then parted /dev/vda resizepart THEPARTYOUWANT 100% then resize2fs /dev/vdaPART
@localhost said: So, whats the difference between this and what you were suggesting earlier?
basically using qemu locally etc, you are just writing a image of the drive to transfer, rather than using the drive attached.
for resizing your partition, use parted print to fix the partition table, then parted /dev/vda resizepart THEPARTYOUWANT 100% then resize2fs /dev/vdaPART
Comments
FFME002 back online
failed Jan 4 07:40 Restored Jan 9 03:22
Plus a number of other nodes.
The offending person's machine has been deleted, but, why the non-offending person's machine is still pending
Just making a guess here, but I would expect that given the number of nodes that went down during the sale and are now back up, I would expect VirMach considered making sure existing VMs were working a priority over getting pending VMs provisioned. I and others also still have pending VMs so your not alone.
LES • About • Donate • Rules • Support
there are way too many offending people services to delete and many machine to troubleshoot at the same time
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
Stacksocial link (aff) containing a gift of $10 after your first purchase.
Thanks for your help. I'm relieved to know that I'm not the only one with a pending machine,
I agree to deal with the existing machine failure. Because of perspective-taking, I don't like my machine failure behind new users
Yo, join our premium masochist club
666
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
Yay!!
New NVME Roulette time.
https://microlxc.net/
It comes to my mind that delayed activation granted ya a window of opportunity for cancellation if grabbed better deal at next year's FS
Only $1.11 and $2.22 the meme level no brainer could beat $6.66 the family heirloom level, I double doubt I could get it through
Yo, join our premium masochist club
if it is unprovisioned until next year's FS, you would have to factor in losses in opportunity costs for:
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
Have a fake 6.66, with same price, but lower Core & Ram & everything ;p
1C 1.8G 15G....
That's gross if appending more than 6 months even at VirmArch's level. My maximum expectation is 3 months.
This one? Still is no brainer, just not at family heirloom level
Yo, join our premium masochist club
It's not unreliable info. Something worth trying out as the netboot.xyz portrays as such. Thanks for your help!
Sure, but 2 Core is little better for k3s, high available version of Virmach
@VirMach Can you send me a server? I'm a student,I am from china.
Like millions of others, then.
It wisnae me! A big boy done it and ran away.
NVMe2G for life! until death (the end is nigh)
i agree 2 core is fine but what work load will you deploy on <2GB - OS ram ?
Shhh, don't wake up his daydream
Yo, join our premium masochist club
how is it dangling today ?
Ya know, just fingered out sometimes silence is a virtue
I suppose that's why VirmAch is playing dead
Yo, join our premium masochist club
If your server is "pending": Wait!
If you have not bought anything: Buy!
hey @Virmach ...
this should wake him up.
Squeeze VirmAch harder
Yo, join our premium masochist club
Just post your mailing address and he'll put it in an envelope for you.
I miss my vps.
I'm also getting the 'Invalid vserverid or username' error while trying to access SolusVM
node: FFME004
id: 685479
Contribute your idling VPS/dedi (link), Android (link) or iOS (link) devices to medical research
Thanks, seems I have xfs and these are for ext4? Ill need to do some more reading
seems
xfs_growfs /did the trick, directly on the luks enabled systemHonestly, I am surprised and kinda thinking... is this it? Just 1 command and all looks good (even after restart)?
Or I am in a dream
Someone can provide some clarity on this, it will be great. Thanks